Browsing posts from October, 2011
Jim Hendry and Mike Quade were joined at the hip the minute Hendry announced Quade as Lou’s replacement. If one went down, so would the other.
Hendry, of course, fell first being relieved of his duties in July by Cubs chairman Tom Ricketts, which put the writing on the wall for Quade’s future as well.
We know managing the Cubs is Quade’s dream job, his efforts reflected such. But the results never materialized, not to the expectations of the Cubs, the fans, and I presume, Quade himself.
This leads me to believe the decision of the Cubs’ new brass to afford Quade an offseason meeting, essential to plead his case to return as manager, was done out of respect for a man who is widely considered one of the good guys in all of baseball.
Let’s call it the politically correct move from the new kids in town, but I suspect nothing more for Epstein’s team otherwise.
Good guy or not, Quade shoulders the misery of the past season, one in which Epstein and company are working hard to avoid repeating.
If Quade is guilty of anything, it’s his association to the old Cubs way and Jim Hendry, which appears to be exactly what Theo and company are distancing themselves from.
Although a second meeting between both parties has been scheduled for later this week, my gut feeling says there won’t be a third.
My money isn’t on Quade’s return, but I’ve been wrong before.
When Scott Feldman walked Yadier Molina with the bases loaded in the fifth inning I switched the TV off.
St. Louis was leading 4-2 and a gut feeling told me this wasn’t the Rangers’ night. They wouldn’t come back, not even with four innings left to play, and despite all the hysterics that took place the night before.
It was a similar feeling of doubt I felt Thursday night with Texas leading by three-runs late in Game 6. “Too close, not over,” I thought.
Unable to bare watching the final innings unfold I turned that game off too, instead opting to listen to the conclusion of Game 6 game on the radio.
Nestled in my office I cranked up the space heater and waited for Texas to celebrate. Of course, that didn’t happen. There I was cold, in the dark, and wondering just how on earth the Rangers had let the series slip to a decisive Game 7.
My nerves were finally spent through five innings Friday night. If Texas came back to win, shame on me for not paying attention. But all I kept thinking was, “Not the Cardinals, not again.”
Only once before had I ever tuned-out a World Series game. Not surprisingly, that came during Game 5 of the 2006 World Series when St. Louis was busy beating the daylights out of Detroit. I simply couldn’t bare the heartache of watching that game either.
There are but three teams I always gain pleasure from watching lose as a Cubs, Colts and Blackhawks fan: The Cardinals, the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Vancouver Canucks.
If Texas could win the World Series I’d have the three-peat in place: Green Bay defeated Pittsburgh in the Super Bowl and Boston won against Vancouver in the Stanley Cup Finals. Not to be, I suppose.
With baseball as my first love, however, this one hurts the most. LaRussa, Pujols, Berkman…Ryan expletive Theriot, baseball’s champions.
Not the Cardinals, not again.
This wasn’t the best game ever played in World Series history, but it’s certainly in the conversation…and near the top of the list.
And as thrilling as David Freese’s walkoff HR was, it’s not the best walkoff HR in World Series history, either. Sorry, Cards fans.
Adrian Beltre has become this October’s version of Edgar Renteria–an accomplished veteran making the most of the postseason.
There’s a striking similarity to the Cubs approach for turning its franchise around to what the Blackhawks have done to right the ship in just a few short years on the city’s West Side.
I was reminded of this Tuesday night at the United Center, watching the Hawks win another thriller in front of a packed house.
With all due respect to Ian Kinsler, who I tabbed as the early favorite to win the World Series MVP Award, Mike Napoli has earned top honors should Texas go on to win it all.
The bearded slugger remains a surprise thorn in the Cardinals side delivering clutch hits throughout the series, including his tiebreaking two-run double in the eight giving the Rangers a 3-2 series advantage in Game 5 Monday night.
Napoli is hitting .308 with 2 HR and a series leading 9 RBI, which nearly matches the offensive output from the rest of the Rangers’ lineup (12 RBI).
If there’s a downside to Derek Holland’s brilliant outing in game 4, (besides his pitiful cookie duster!) it’s that he likely won’t be available to start a potential Game 7 scheduled Thursday night in St. Louis.
“It wasn’t a Series-saving rally, but it was huge.” -Ian Kinsler
Sorry Charlie, but I couldn’t disagree more!
Of the 50 World Series that began 2-0, the team having won the first two games has gone on to win the series 40 times. That’s good for 80-percent.
So it’s hard to believe Texas would’ve rebounded from those long odds, even with the series shifting to Arlington for Game 3.
Thankfully, for those of us rooting for the Rangers, it’s still a winnable series due to a dramatic, and historic, ninth inning comeback–thanks in large part to Kinsler’s leadoff single and clutch stolen base to ignite the top of the ninth inning.
At some point I’ll have to give St. Louis credit for winning games this postseason.
I’m not ready to do just yet, even though they’ve ventured deep into October winning the NLDS, the NLCS and taking a 1-0 lead in the World Series.
Game after game, round after round…the Cards lull to sleep its opposition with shaky starting pitching, a patch work bullpen and just enough offense.
It’s certainly not pretty baseball, but it’s certainly not all luck, either.
My hesitation to acknowledge the Cards’ success is, without question, my sour grapes as a Cubs fan. But more so, I’m soured by the fact Philly bowed out so easily in the NLDS, and by Milwaukee’s bumbling fielding and lack of clutch hitting in the NLCS. Awful performances for two of the league’s better teams.
Now, it seems, Texas is following suite–rolling over like a damn dog and letting the Cards walk on by…just like the rest of the NL. (How many more times will the Rangers stare at a called strike 1,2 & 3 trailing by one run late in the game?)
No doubt the game’s greatest hitter, an ace pitcher and a dominate closers can take you far, even more so with one of the game’s greatest managers.
Maybe the Cards deserve a little credit, after all. But I think I’ll wait until they win the World Series to give it to them.
Two reasons I’m picking the Rangers to win the World Series.
First of all, I made the awful mistake of choosing hitting over pitching in last year’s Fall Classic. Not smart.
Any good baseball fan knows good pitching beats good hitting, especially in the postseason, and that was more than evident with San Fran’s dominate staff last October.
Secondly, I just can’t bring myself to pick St. Louis seeing as they’re the Cubs’ biggest rival. I know that’s not the most sound prognostication, but I’d rather not jeopardize any good karma choosing the Cards to win it all.
Wishful thinking aside, there’s no clear evidence suggesting either club has better starting pitching.
So why choose Texas?